On Oct. 1, 2016, President Obama will give away control of the Internet to a multi-national body, despite Congress having passed laws forbidding him to do so. Conservative lawyer and activist Phyllis Schlafly blasted the Obama’s complete disregard for the legislative process, saying it: “… could be the most dangerous use yet of Obama’s now-famous pen.”
https://youtu.be/BD17m6qrKQQ
Related:
Last-ditch push-back over Obama’s Internet giveaway
“If enacted legislation is no longer considered binding, a fundamental check on executive power will have been lost. Legislators also have a solemn responsibility to future generations to ensure that the future of the Internet is not placed at risk by prematurely ending U.S. oversight. We urge you to act promptly.”
Do we want U.N. to control Internet?
Phyllis Schlafly likens Obama’s ‘multi-stakeholder’ idea to giving away Panama Canal
#1A #FreeSpeech is the Cabal's Enemy #ICANN #InternetKillSwitch #Tech #ntia https://t.co/pqtuuULCwW @StefanMolyneux @UnaffiliatedPrt
— Jana Murray (@janamurray) October 1, 2016
Does UN Control of Internet Endanger Freedom? https://t.co/n1xXrHajyo @HenryMakow #ICANN #1a #FreeSpeech #SR1144 pic.twitter.com/PE3x27fRe4
— Jana Murray (@janamurray) September 14, 2016
Could The Internet Be Set To Be Shut Down On The Eve Of Jubilee October 1st?: https://t.co/SniXOTjidC via @YouTube
— The Dollar Vigilante (@DollarVigilante) August 30, 2016